Just before
the opening of the Enugu Airport to international flights last week, through
text messages and emails, I called the attention of the Nigerian civil civil
aviation authorities at the ministry and at its parastatals to the quality of
the aviation security control at that airport. Enugu airport was not the only
airport that the quality of its security control programme requires attention,
all the Nigerian 22 airports under the management of FAAN require such
attention, because as I said in the mails, none of these airports had airport
security fence. Sure, they all have perimeter fences that could be said to have
met the international requirement for aerodrome standards (ICAO Annex 14), but
most of them do not have enhanced security fence to enable them sufficiently comply
with ICAO Annex 17 on Aviation Security.
Away from the
buck passing that is going on now between FAAN and Arik Airline,the incident
that occurred on Arik flight from Benin to Lagos on Saturday 24th
August 2013 called to question the quality of the airport security control programme
at Benin Airport and the other 22 airports and the quality of Arik Airline
security control programme. By now, the NCAA, the responsible civil aviation
authority should be finding out what the quality of the access control at Benin
Airport was like and what was the quality of the airport perimeter fence that
enabled a teenager to cross the security controlled line? Was the airport
conducting routine or regular patrol of the perimeter fence if the perimeter
fence was not security enhanced?
Responsible
authority should in addition, find out: how did a teenager acting alone get
access into the airport security controlled area? Did he get any help from airport staff to find
the aircraft undercarriage hold as safe area to hide or did he find it by
himself? For a teenager who knew little to nothing about aircraft, he probably
got some insider help to do what he did.
Secondly, if
the news report quoting the spokesman of FAAN was true, that the pilot of the Arik
aircraft was informed of the unusual movement of a person under the aircraft
before the takeoff from Benin, the pilot took a questionable risk that must be
investigated by the NCAA. We could start
having copycats or moles of terrorists as stowaway, if the NCAA and State
Security Service respectively or collectively fail to commence immediate
investigation into the acts of the boy, and that of the pilot.
The
information provided by a passenger on board the aircraft was critical for the
pilot to have aborted his takeoff from Benin and allow the security authority
at the airport to conduct search, checks or inspection of the aircraft before
any further takeoff in accordance with the provision of International Standard
on civil aviation security (ICAO Annex 17). With the level of criminal
activities in our environment, the boy could have been a courier for any of our
homegrown terrorist groups sent to place explosive devices under the aircraft
at the point of take-off.
Buck passing
that provides no solutions seems to be regular trade marks by aviation
operators whenever something goes wrong with the security and safety systems
that they have themselves put in place. Recall that, it was the same buck
passing between Arik and FAAN when Arik Pilot taxied his aircraft into a parked
aircraft at Jos airport few years ago claiming that the apron markings were too
faint to be seen. It was the same buck passing among operators, FAAN, NAHCO
inclusive, and government customs agency at MMIA when DDC machine got stolen by
a trespasser through the airport fence from Akowonjo end of the airport perimeter
fence.
This latest
incidence of breaches in aviation security opens a window of opportunity for
the new leadership at the NCAA to conduct comprehensive security survey or
audits on all the nations airports and domestic airlines security programmes
and the National Civil Aviation Security Programmes (NCASP) with a view to
adjusting their vulnerability to the current level of the threats in our
environment.
The stowaway
of Saturday 24 August 2013 by a teenager was not the first occurrence in
Nigeria. In 1992, a boy of about the same age with the one in the latest
incidence, flew in similar manner on KLM to Armsterdam and was brought back to
Nigeria through the MMIA two weeks later by the Dutch police and immigration
officers. One adult whose identity could
not be determined and his nationality became controvercial did not survive in
the aircraft undercarriage hole of an Egypt Air flight between Abidjan and
Lagos in 1992.

